<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Energy-Efficient Server Research Mandated by Congress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.petercellis.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.petercellis.com/blog/?p=519</link>
	<description>Personal Thoughts and Ramblings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 06:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.37</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.petercellis.com/blog/?p=519#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2006 22:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energysoapbox.org/2006/07/14/energy-efficient-server-research-mandated-by-congress/#comment-36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Energy Star ratings system was started by the EPA, though I&#039;m not certain that it was in response to any sort of Congressional mandate.  They established a program that today is the standard for considering the energy efficiency of appliances.  There&#039;s supposedly a new Energy Star standard for computers coming out in mid-2007.  The need for power-efficient computing has been around for a while, and there&#039;s been little research in the field that I&#039;m completely aware of until very recently.  I see no problem with such a mandate and funding for it - if anything, it will spark private innovation even more than it already has.

I seem to recall seeing articles in the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers and Association of Computing Machinery literature recently on the subject of energy-efficient processors and the like.  It&#039;s not that such research doesn&#039;t exist, it&#039;s that it&#039;s not currently supported by the government directly, via the EPA or otherwise.

It does seem odd to me that the EPA should be the target of such a mandate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Energy Star ratings system was started by the EPA, though I&#8217;m not certain that it was in response to any sort of Congressional mandate.  They established a program that today is the standard for considering the energy efficiency of appliances.  There&#8217;s supposedly a new Energy Star standard for computers coming out in mid-2007.  The need for power-efficient computing has been around for a while, and there&#8217;s been little research in the field that I&#8217;m completely aware of until very recently.  I see no problem with such a mandate and funding for it &#8211; if anything, it will spark private innovation even more than it already has.</p>
<p>I seem to recall seeing articles in the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers and Association of Computing Machinery literature recently on the subject of energy-efficient processors and the like.  It&#8217;s not that such research doesn&#8217;t exist, it&#8217;s that it&#8217;s not currently supported by the government directly, via the EPA or otherwise.</p>
<p>It does seem odd to me that the EPA should be the target of such a mandate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.petercellis.com/blog/?p=519#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2006 22:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energysoapbox.org/2006/07/14/energy-efficient-server-research-mandated-by-congress/#comment-38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Energy Star ratings system was started by the EPA, though I&#039;m not certain that it was in response to any sort of Congressional mandate.  They established a program that today is the standard for considering the energy efficiency of appliances.  There&#039;s supposedly a new Energy Star standard for computers coming out in mid-2007.  The need for power-efficient computing has been around for a while, and there&#039;s been little research in the field that I&#039;m completely aware of until very recently.  I see no problem with such a mandate and funding for it - if anything, it will spark private innovation even more than it already has.

I seem to recall seeing articles in the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers and Association of Computing Machinery literature recently on the subject of energy-efficient processors and the like.  It&#039;s not that such research doesn&#039;t exist, it&#039;s that it&#039;s not currently supported by the government directly, via the EPA or otherwise.

It does seem odd to me that the EPA should be the target of such a mandate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Energy Star ratings system was started by the EPA, though I&#8217;m not certain that it was in response to any sort of Congressional mandate.  They established a program that today is the standard for considering the energy efficiency of appliances.  There&#8217;s supposedly a new Energy Star standard for computers coming out in mid-2007.  The need for power-efficient computing has been around for a while, and there&#8217;s been little research in the field that I&#8217;m completely aware of until very recently.  I see no problem with such a mandate and funding for it &#8211; if anything, it will spark private innovation even more than it already has.</p>
<p>I seem to recall seeing articles in the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers and Association of Computing Machinery literature recently on the subject of energy-efficient processors and the like.  It&#8217;s not that such research doesn&#8217;t exist, it&#8217;s that it&#8217;s not currently supported by the government directly, via the EPA or otherwise.</p>
<p>It does seem odd to me that the EPA should be the target of such a mandate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myles Bostwick</title>
		<link>http://www.petercellis.com/blog/?p=519#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Myles Bostwick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2006 21:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energysoapbox.org/2006/07/14/energy-efficient-server-research-mandated-by-congress/#comment-37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was reading over this bill at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c109:3:./temp/~c109Yzva2w:: and I really don&#039;t feel this is any kind of landmark or even something to be excited about.  The government is launching another study and using $500,000 to do it.  The ultimate goal being to encourage &quot;purchasers of computer servers to give high priority to energy efficiency as a factor in determining best value and performance for purchases of computer servers.&quot; Why can&#039;t the encouragement be done without the half a million dollars?  Ok, there&#039;s the topic, discuss.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reading over this bill at <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c109:3" rel="nofollow">http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c109:3</a>:./temp/~c109Yzva2w:: and I really don&#8217;t feel this is any kind of landmark or even something to be excited about.  The government is launching another study and using $500,000 to do it.  The ultimate goal being to encourage &#8220;purchasers of computer servers to give high priority to energy efficiency as a factor in determining best value and performance for purchases of computer servers.&#8221; Why can&#8217;t the encouragement be done without the half a million dollars?  Ok, there&#8217;s the topic, discuss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myles Bostwick</title>
		<link>http://www.petercellis.com/blog/?p=519#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Myles Bostwick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2006 21:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energysoapbox.org/2006/07/14/energy-efficient-server-research-mandated-by-congress/#comment-39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was reading over this bill at http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c109:3:./temp/~c109Yzva2w:: and I really don&#039;t feel this is any kind of landmark or even something to be excited about.  The government is launching another study and using $500,000 to do it.  The ultimate goal being to encourage &quot;purchasers of computer servers to give high priority to energy efficiency as a factor in determining best value and performance for purchases of computer servers.&quot; Why can&#039;t the encouragement be done without the half a million dollars?  Ok, there&#039;s the topic, discuss.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reading over this bill at <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c109:3" rel="nofollow">http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c109:3</a>:./temp/~c109Yzva2w:: and I really don&#8217;t feel this is any kind of landmark or even something to be excited about.  The government is launching another study and using $500,000 to do it.  The ultimate goal being to encourage &#8220;purchasers of computer servers to give high priority to energy efficiency as a factor in determining best value and performance for purchases of computer servers.&#8221; Why can&#8217;t the encouragement be done without the half a million dollars?  Ok, there&#8217;s the topic, discuss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
